Assignment 4: Thoughts on Network Neutrality
Network neutrality has become a major issue in our society today. It is a topic that requires difficult consideration and does not have an obvious correct answer. The pros of net neutrality are thought to be, first, that is provides nondiscriminatory access. This means that all access to anything on the web is equal, certain websites don't load faster than others, for example. Second, net neutrality sparks innovation and creativity. Websites like Google, eBay, and YouTube were able to be created because of net neutrality, and it also encourages creative expression. For example, if net neutrality did not exist, aspects such as online schooling would be much more restricted. Lastly, net neutrality provides a competitive marketplace. In the United States there is access to only one, maybe two, ISPs, or Internet Service Providers without authority to regulate the web. Along with these positive aspects of net neutrality there are, of course, cons as well. The cons are that additional legislation is required, which would most likely cause more harm than good due to the fact that internet technology is constantly changing, making it difficult to keep up with. With deficient laws, this would cripple commonplace safety practices throughout the web. Along with requiring more legislation, cable providers believe that tiered access is a better approach to the internet. This would mean that people pay for different levels of internet service, supposedly benefiting all users of the network. This issue has both positive and negative factors making it very difficult to come to a conclusion on the issue.In recent news, net neutrality was the topic in a case of the federal appeals court on Tuesday, involving the FCC not having the rights to enforce paying to stream videos at full speed and making certain websites have slower access than others. The court ruled that only the government has the authority to oversee crucial utilities, such as telephone service and electricity, however the Internet is not considered to be a crucial utility. This effects almost every user of the internet because if this situation occurred cable companies would pick and choose which websites will get better access than others. They would play favorites, making certain websites have an unfair advantage. The topic of net neutrality is incredibly difficult to tackle. As much as I believe that not everyone should be able to access all the information the internet has to offer, such as kids accessing content that is beyond their understanding, it is incredible difficult to limit the internet for a certain division of society. It's virtually impossible to restrict certain information from specific people, especially without violating the First Amendment. With society's freedom to speech, religion, press, and so forth, it makes it much to difficult for the government to get around this standard and limit certain people. Because of these aspects I do support net neutrality, unfortunately, because of the standards our country was created on and because of the vast information on the world wide web, the government is unable to decide which should be accessible to all or not.
More recent net neutrality news:
http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/issues/net-neutrality.htm
ABC, a legitimate news cooperation, has an entire section dedicated to net neutrality and all the recent issues that come up with it.
http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2014/02/survey-net-neutrality/
Wired, a website we have used for sources in class, covers and article in the past month stating that 10% of users would quit the internet if net neutrality "dies." This is also pro to net neutrality, without it the usage of the internet would definitely decrease.